What Claims Teams Don’t See Is Costing Them and Why the Window to Act Is Shorter Than You Think
How hidden comorbidities and delayed clinical insight drive Workers’ Comp claim costs — and what early detection changes

WCI 2026 Platinum Sponsor Article | Presented by Gradient AI

By Brook Rosenbaum, General Manager, Property & Casualty Business, Gradient AI

Workers’ compensation has always been a discipline that rewards preparation over reaction. Experienced claims professionals know that the cases most likely to become expensive are often the ones that don’t look that way at intake. The back strain. The soft tissue case. The routine fall. They arrive without red flags, move into standard processing and sometimes emerge months later as high-cost, high-complexity claims that no one saw coming.

The challenge isn’t that claims teams lack awareness of the risks that drive severity. The challenge is that the information needed to act on those risks is almost never available at the moment it matters most.

The Moment That Determines Everything

Consider a familiar scenario: a warehouse worker files a claim for lower back strain following a fall. The adjuster opens the file, follows standard protocol, and processes accordingly. What the file doesn’t yet show — and may not show for weeks — are the details that will ultimately define the claim’s trajectory:

A pre-existing Type 2 diabetes diagnosis that will complicate tissue healing
A history of orthopedic treatment for the same back region
A current medication regimen that interacts poorly with standard pain management

Without that clinical context at the outset, the claim proceeds on assumptions. Recovery stalls. The worker, uncertain and frustrated, seeks legal counsel. What should have been a manageable claim becomes a protracted, expensive one with costs running roughly four times the original estimate.

This isn’t an unusual story. It’s a pattern.

Two Factors Drive the Majority of Excess Cost

Research consistently points to two variables as the primary drivers of claim severity — and both share a critical characteristic: they’re often invisible at First Notice of Loss.

Comorbidities are more prevalent — and more costly — than many claims teams realize. According to WCRI research drawing on 930,000 claims across 32 states, 38.8% of lost-time claims involve at least one comorbidity. Claims with even a single comorbidity generate medical payments and indemnity benefits more than 2x higher than those without — and costs and disability durations increase further with each additional comorbidity present. (Source: WCRI, Degenerative and Comorbid Conditions in Workers Compensation, March 2025.)
Attorney involvement, most often triggered by delayed or inadequate care, compounds the financial impact dramatically. A 2024 WCRI study found that attorney-involved claims see lost time days increase by 284% and expense payments inflate by 200%.

These two factors are deeply connected. When appropriate care is delayed because the clinical complexity of a claim wasn’t visible at intake worker frustration rises, outcomes deteriorate, and attorney involvement becomes far more likely. The path to lower costs runs directly through earlier, better-informed intervention.

The Real Problem Is Timing

Most claims professionals already understand these dynamics. The gap isn’t knowledge, it’s timing. Key medical details don’t appear in the initial claim file. Claimants don’t always disclose full treatment histories. Comorbidities surface gradually, often only after the claim has already begun to deteriorate.

By the time the full clinical picture is visible, the window for proactive intervention has closed. Teams are no longer managing risk. They’re managing a problem that has already grown.

Closing that gap requires a different approach: bringing relevant clinical context into the claims process at the moment the claim is filed, not after the file has told its story.

What Early Clinical Insight Makes Possible

When claims teams have access to relevant injured worker health data at First Notice of Loss — pre-existing conditions, treatment history, medication profiles — the entire trajectory of a claim can change. Adjusters can assign the right resources from day one. Nurse case managers can engage with the full clinical picture. Care plans can account for factors that would otherwise surface only after complications emerge.

The downstream effects compound over time. Faster, more appropriate treatment reduces the likelihood of attorney involvement. Better coordination between adjusters and clinical resources produces more informed care planning and a faster path to recovery. At the portfolio level, earlier identification of high-risk claims leads to better reserve accuracy, fewer high-cost outliers, and stronger predictive modeling across the book.

The goal of returning injured workers to pre-injury functionality as quickly and fully as possible becomes more achievable when the information needed to pursue it is available at the start, not discovered along the way.

Tools That Bring the Future Forward

Technology has made meaningful progress in closing this timing gap. AI solutions now exist that match injured workers to their health data at FNOL using extensive medical databases, surfacing comorbidities, treatment histories and medication profiles before they appear in the claim file. Gradient AI’s ClaimVoyant™ is one such solution, with match rates exceeding 90% and designed specifically to give claims teams — and the TPAs and self-insured employers who rely on them — a clinical picture at day one rather than month three. By integrating complexity signals directly into adjuster workflows, it enables the kind of proactive, informed intervention that changes claim outcomes.

The broader principle applies regardless of the specific tool. The earlier a claims team has access to the full clinical context of a case, the better the outcome is likely to be for the insurer, for the employer, and for the injured worker.

A Discipline Built on What You Know and When You Know It

Workers’ compensation has always rewarded the professionals who prepare rather than react. The cases that resolve quickly, fairly, and at appropriate cost are almost always the ones where the right information reached the right people at the right time.

The industry’s challenge today isn’t a lack of data. It’s the gap between when critical information exists and when it currently arrives in the claims process. Closing that gap even partially, has measurable consequences for outcomes, costs and the experience of the workers at the center of every claim.


Brook Rosenbaum leads strategy and execution for Gradient’s Property and Casualty segment. He brings more than 15 years’ experience in the P&C insurance industry. Brook has held leadership positions in product management and development, digital transformation, and go-to-market strategy in Insurtech and large carriers.

If your organization is navigating these challenges and exploring how earlier clinical insight can improve claims outcomes, we’d welcome the conversation. Reach out to the Gradient AI team at info@gradientai.com or visit gradientai.com to learn more about how we work with carriers, TPAs and self-insured employers to put clinical intelligence to work earlier in the claims process.